Full teaching record
apisihagüda
EN to cause (someone) to break in pieces
Meaning & authority
Evidence state: CONTEXT-ATTESTED FORM — source-attributed usage preserved
Attributed sources: Hererun Wagüchagu · lenguas honduras
Academic authority: Haurholm-Larsen 2016 §3.3.4 (-ti/-tu); Stark 2018 (diachronic *-thi/*-thu)
How the form is built
Root: apisiha — to break in pieces
- CAUS — Haurholm-Larsen 2016 §3.3.4 (-ti/-tu); Stark 2018 (diachronic *-thi/*-thu)
-guda — CAUS [Haurholm-Larsen 2016 §3.3.4 (-ti/-tu); Stark 2018 (diachronic *-thi/*-thu)]
Academic teaching rationale
### apisihaguda *“to cause (someone) to break in pieces.”* The form **apisihaguda** is built upon the root *apisiha*, “to break in pieces” (NISAMINA master dictionary). To it is joined the causative suffix *-guda*, which turns the action outward — to cause or make someone else perform it. Taken whole, the word means precisely “to cause (someone) to break in pieces” — its gloss states the fully-inflected sense, never the bare meaning of the root. To see its precise force, compare **napisiha** (“I break in pieces”); **bapisiha** (“you break in pieces”): each shares the same stem yet bends it to a different shade of meaning, which is exactly how Garífuna wins great precision from a single root. *The construction rests on Haurholm-Larsen 2016 §3.3.4 (-ti/-tu). This is a principled composition — a cited root joined to a cited paradigm — and so it is offered for fluent-elder validation rather than asserted as attested.*
Voices & attributed examples (1)
apisiha [amurusuhabai ereba le, hadan].
Suazo — Lila Garífuna Diccionario (permission granted) · attributed_sentence_bank
Exact community voice contexts (…)
Occurrence is not definition. These links provide attributed sentence context only; they do not alter this entry's meaning, root, morphology, derivation, translation, evidence state, or elder-review status.
Loading exact community voice contexts…
Open the complete named community voice archiveCommunity orthography candidates—not admitted examples (…)
Review candidate only. Stress marks may differ, but `ü`, `ñ`, letters, apostrophes, hyphens, and token boundaries are preserved. Nothing here changes spelling, meaning, evidence state, or elder-review status.
Loading review-only community orthography candidates…
Review this form across the complete named voice archive