Full teaching record
eheiridagua
EN to tear up; to squat
Meaning & authority
Evidence state: SOURCE-ATTESTED LEXICAL SENSE
Attributed sources: The People’s Garífuna Dictionary
Academic authority: Haurholm-Larsen 2016 §3.3.4 (-ti/-tu); Stark 2018 (diachronic *-thi/*-thu)
How the form is built
Root: eheirida — to tear eheiriduni
- CONT (constantly) — Haurholm-Larsen 2016 §3.3.4 (-ti/-tu); Stark 2018 (diachronic *-thi/*-thu)
-gua — CONT (constantly) [Haurholm-Larsen 2016 §3.3.4 (-ti/-tu); Stark 2018 (diachronic *-thi/*-thu)]
Academic teaching rationale
### eheiridagua *“to constantly tear eheiriduni / to be in the act of tear eheiriduniing.”* The form **eheiridagua** is built upon the root *eheirida*, “to tear eheiriduni” (The People's Garifuna Dictionary (Cayetano)). To it is joined the continuous/middle suffix *-gua*, which holds the subject in the ongoing act — 'to be constantly …-ing'. Taken whole, the word means precisely “to constantly tear eheiriduni / to be in the act of tear eheiriduniing” — its gloss states the fully-inflected sense, never the bare meaning of the root. To see its precise force, compare **neheirida** (“I tear eheiriduni”); **beheirida** (“you tear eheiriduni”): each shares the same stem yet bends it to a different shade of meaning, which is exactly how Garífuna wins great precision from a single root. *The construction rests on Haurholm-Larsen 2016 §3.3.4 (-ti/-tu). This is a principled composition — a cited root joined to a cited paradigm — and so it is offered for fluent-elder validation rather than asserted as attested.*
Voices & attributed examples (0)
No attributed public example is attached to this record yet.
Exact community voice contexts (…)
Occurrence is not definition. These links provide attributed sentence context only; they do not alter this entry's meaning, root, morphology, derivation, translation, evidence state, or elder-review status.
Loading exact community voice contexts…
Open the complete named community voice archiveCommunity orthography candidates—not admitted examples (…)
Review candidate only. Stress marks may differ, but `ü`, `ñ`, letters, apostrophes, hyphens, and token boundaries are preserved. Nothing here changes spelling, meaning, evidence state, or elder-review status.
Loading review-only community orthography candidates…
Review this form across the complete named voice archive