Full teaching record
magaraühati
EN he does not have children by different men or women
Meaning & authority
Evidence state: COMPOSITIONAL CANDIDATE — elder validation required
Attributed sources: Hererun Wagüchagu · The People’s Garífuna Dictionary
Academic authority: Munro & Gallagher, 'Garifuna Negatives' (m- verbal negation); Haurholm-Larsen 2016 §3.3.4 (-ti/-tu); Stark 2018 (diachronic *-thi/*-thu)
How the form is built
Root: agaraüha — to have children by different men or women
- NEG — Munro & Gallagher, 'Garifuna Negatives' (m- verbal negation)
- 3SG.M — Haurholm-Larsen 2016 §3.3.4 (-ti/-tu); Stark 2018 (diachronic *-thi/*-thu)
m- — NEG [Munro & Gallagher, 'Garifuna Negatives' (m- verbal negation)]
-ti — 3SG.M [Haurholm-Larsen 2016 §3.3.4 (-ti/-tu); Stark 2018 (diachronic *-thi/*-thu)]
Academic teaching rationale
### magaraühati *“he does not have children by different men or women.”* The form **magaraühati** is built upon the root *agaraüha*, “to have children by different men or women” (The People's Garifuna Dictionary (Cayetano)). To it are joined the privative-negative prefix *m-*, which negates the action or denies the quality outright; then the third-person masculine ('he') agreement suffix *-ti*, which fixes the subject as third-person masculine ('he'). Taken whole, the word means precisely “he does not have children by different men or women” — its gloss states the fully-inflected sense, never the bare meaning of the root. To see its precise force, compare **nagaraüha** (“I have children by different men or women”); **bagaraüha** (“you have children by different men or women”): each shares the same stem yet bends it to a different shade of meaning, which is exactly how Garífuna wins great precision from a single root. *The construction rests on Haurholm-Larsen 2016 §3.3.4 (-ti/-tu); Munro & Gallagher, 'Garifuna Negatives' (m- verbal negation). This is a principled composition — a cited root joined to a cited paradigm — and so it is offered for fluent-elder validation rather than asserted as attested.*
Voices & attributed examples (0)
No attributed public example is attached to this record yet.
Exact community voice contexts (…)
Occurrence is not definition. These links provide attributed sentence context only; they do not alter this entry's meaning, root, morphology, derivation, translation, evidence state, or elder-review status.
Loading exact community voice contexts…
Open the complete named community voice archiveCommunity orthography candidates—not admitted examples (…)
Review candidate only. Stress marks may differ, but `ü`, `ñ`, letters, apostrophes, hyphens, and token boundaries are preserved. Nothing here changes spelling, meaning, evidence state, or elder-review status.
Loading review-only community orthography candidates…
Review this form across the complete named voice archive